Posted by & filed under Articles.

IMAG1259

Copenhagen

 

I have been lazy or busy, you decide. I have recently thrown myself at a job outside of archaeology, a call centre in fact and my day to day work consists of customer service in both English and German. Despite this straying from archaeology, I have tried to keep it close to my heart, but unfortunately sometimes a little too close, straying into my free time outside of work and putting me under a little bit of pressure. In an overcompensation I jumped on any project I could, and so I started having to juggle things. April has been really busy for myself, at the start of the month I had to go back to Northern Ireland for family, then headed to the Hidden Heritage Conference in Dorchester, after which I was in Copenhagen and finally CIfA 2016.

Read more »

Posted by & filed under Uncategorised.

I am taking this wording directly out of the mouth of Slovenian philosopher Salvoj Zizek, from his book of the same title. I find this phrase particularly fitting to the situation that is currently occurring with regards to Palmyra and the way in which the UK government’s response has been awkward and ridiculous.  I am talking mainly about the ‘reconstruction’ of an archway of Palmyra that was first displayed in the British museum and then at Trafalgar square. The monument’s creation comes after Boris Johnson’s original comments of ‘sending British archaeologists to…rebuild Palmyra’, an unarchaeological endeavour indeed.

Read more »

Posted by & filed under Articles.

eaa logo

 

 

UPDATE : I managed to get both of the wonderful EAA Glasgow social teams’ names wrong – I apologise profusely. Thank you to everyone for your interest!

 

The return journey from Glasgow to Fife was a lonely, empty one; I tried to keep up on twitter but the hastag #EAAGla was all but silent. The same hashtag that had been alive and well for the last four days was now showing the last few dribbles of conversations –the  thank yous and see you agains. It felt very much as if the energy had been sapped away; but how did Twitter become so all-encompassing, how did it gain so much energy in the first place?

The first interactions with the social media team for EAA Glagsow 2015 primed the entire conference, from the start, there was a sense of authentic, earnest communication, often considered a rarity among “official accounts” of large organizations. Instead the amazing team of Kimm Curran and Christina Gilfedder set the cogs in motion for an engaged audience. I blame their insistence on my session having cake on the fact I went out to buy cake instead of preparing for my session (let me preface this, I did promise cake). On my first night in Glasgow I felt myself being led away by archaeologists for a pint, walking and chatting, I didn’t notice two figures across the road looking at me going into ‘the wrong pub’. After securing a drink I turn around and there stand before me are two women kitted out with social media hoodies, saying “Mr. Boyle, there you are” – oh dear, I’ve been in Glasgow 2 hours, how can I already be infamous? It soon came to light who stood before me – I was amazed that they had found and recognized me, that was something special.

Read more »

Posted by & filed under .

soupandsandwichmealdeal

 

Hello Everyone or alternatively helo pawb if you are Welsh!

 

Once again I am joined by Mr. Soup from ArchaeoSoup Productions bringing a somewhat respectable air to the chaotic show! We talk topical stories in archaeology, Nefertiti’s Tomb and why that ties into press releases and sensationalism in the media. Next up we talk about how history is misread by society and Mr. soup and I get into a bit of a back and forth about the purpose of history.

We discuss the reaction to the recent Motherboard article by Andrew Reinhard and what that means for archaeology.

Are you a meta – processual archaeologist?

 

WARNING : Terrible jokes, really bad puns and a chaotic conversation

Posted by & filed under .

Hello Everyone – so I lost episode 22 – oops, sorry.

 

Instead I am producing an episode here and now and with many more detintely in the pipeline. Today’s episode talks about my new job, EAA Glasgow 2015 conference and what I have coming up for you in the next couple of weeks. An important message I would like to share is that of how speaking online isn’t something we should do lightly, in fact, we should actually be more ready to listen to others and what they have to say rather than making sure our voice is the loudest in the room 100% of the time. It can be doifficult to feel heard especially in the ocean of voices on the internet, but we should take this time we have to listen and engage – listen and Retweet. If you want to read the whole thing you can find a link here to the blog.

Finishing off the episode with a little segment called Ask An Archaeologist with questions from my Twitter feed! Thank you all for sending them in!

 

The League of Nerds Podcast – 085 Cancer ‘cures’ and cannabis

Posted by & filed under Articles.

listenandrtbanner copyHello and welcome to a much needed blog post here on the Anarchaeologist. I know I know, I’ve been bad with updates and writing stuff and I apologise for anyone waiting on me to write or say something. I’ve been disappointing a lot of people recently and it’s time to rectify that. I have been silent recently about work because I have been building up to announcing leaving my current employment to go and be an archaeologist. It’s really exciting and I just can’t wait to get my hands covered in soil and my field notebook full of penciled notes. This has been a long time coming and hopefully will inspire me to create new content with a number of different amazing people out there.

 

It is wonderful to be part of the huge twitter community and to be able to talk to people who have a passion for archaeology and beyond. I have to really give a huge shout-out to the amazing podcasting community that has been so supportive and fun to chat with. It is important to note here that if I really attempted to mention them all, I would most certainly leave someone out but I can say that I have been on a number of shows which a quick google search will bring out (for better or worse).

 

There is another side to my twitter account, and that is the voices that aren’t usually heard; this is something that I have attempted to promote with my show but I feel that I haven’t said strongly enough. If you were to check through my feed, you would find a mix of archaeologists, podcasters, Indigenous people’s twitters, feminists and POC twitters. I don’t want to wear this as a badge of pride, in fact, this should be the norm; because in following a mix of different people, I get to read things that would never cross my mind. Twitter has opened my eyes to a number of Indigenous People’s concerns, particularly about Murdered and Missing Indigenous Women #MMIW, a worryingly underrepresented issue in politics. On top of this, there are twitter handles that talk about the issues with cultural appropriation and stereotypes about Indigenous peoples and importantly why these things are needing addressing. And how should we address these things? Listen and retweet. Simple. Understand where these people are coming from and try to take on board what they say on good faith. This doesn’t mean take it on board and try to respond with #NotAllEtc but understand that there maybe validity in criticism.

 

And this all ties into how we talk to each other over social media, in the ways that many different thoughts and feelings mix across the internet. Often when I tweet I feel that I throw my thoughts in the void and I don’t necessarily feel anyone has to engage with me. That’s ok, personally when I tweet something that’s on my mind I would like people to reply, however not everyone is the same. Sometimes what we put out there is a gasp of desperation or just a simple venting of emotion and we have to realise that despite the political nature of what someone says, it may not always be appropriate to engage. I saw a tweet today about badges at the Nine Worlds 2015 conference (@London_Geekfest), which came in three colours signifying whether an individual wants to engage in conversation or not. Blue meant please talk to me, yellow meant talk to me if you know me and red meant don’t talk to me unless I begin the conversation. I thought it was fantastic, there was no ambiguity as to the appropriateness of engagement with the individual. It made me think of whether it is appropriate to engage all the time.

  I replied to a tweet which was a joke conversation highlighting flippant dismissal of sexism in science, leading into a conversation about whether the 1950s were a great time for women. There was a back and forth between myself and another Twitter-user but it included the handle of the original Tweeter. I wonder if it was right of me to continue using that original person’s handle when the conversation was obviously between me and this new user. You can read the full conversation here, but it’s pretty obvious that I disagree that the world is gynocentric and feminism isn’t needed. In fact, in my opinion, this other twitter user demonstrated the Lewis Law (any conversation about Feminism will prove why Feminism is needed). I stopped the conversation saying that it was obvious we disagreed and it wasn’t going anywhere, and although the other user bid me good day, he (I assume) continued to tweet me. So I wonder where have I overstayed my welcome on Twitter, where have I made the same mistake? I was very clear when I wanted the conversation to end but maybe other people aren’t as forward.

In this vein, I want to talk about why social media is different to traditional media, in the way that on Twitter and Facebook people don’t have to be the representative to talk to you. In traditional media, the news interviews representatives of groups and institutions whose job it is to talk to people and do outreach, on social media this isn’t always the case. Not everyone has to reply to what you say about their tweet and if you continue to try and talk to them and try and point out their silence as rude, then you may be “Seal-lioning” – i.e. finding people expressing themselves and trying to engage in conversation with them in bad faith, getting under their skin and then complaining that they aren’t be polite in your forced discussion. The benefit of the internet is that there are thousands, if not millions, of people happy to debate whatever topic you but not everyone.

 

Finally I want to highlight a conversation that came up out of me tweeting about the League of Nerds Podcast, asking if their guest had a twitter account because I really liked what they had to say and would appreciate their updates on my feed. That wasn’t an issue at all, but then another Twitter user chimed in a link to an indiegogo campaign on “Alternative Cancer Cure”. With respect to the original podcast episode, this seems to be relevant, since the podcast was about cancer and the search for a cancer cure. However if you listened to the episode the guest highlighted that cancer as a single disease is a misnomer because each cancer behaves in a different way and requires different treatment. The guest is a cancer research specialist, @vickyyyf, who went into detail about the issues with a cancer cure and gives a great insight into her personal story about cancer and why she now researches it. The Alternative Cancer Cure indiegogo was about a film (not yet finished) that brought up conspiracies and issues with BigPharma, something that was quickly and succinctly criticised and the conversation noted as over. However our intrepid Twitter user then began to seal lion. See the conversation below and understand what the issue is here; Twitter is a public forum and you are allowed to comment and state your opinion, but if someone says they don’t want to continue the conversation and you keep talking, that’s the problem.

 

 

This kind of behaviour needs to stop, mainly because it’s not how you have a conversation or discussion. No one online is answerable to you, it’s not their job to talk to you, in fact someone replying and engaging with what you have to say is something special; people have lives and other things to do.

 

There are people who will debate you and talk to you but there’s a time and place for everything. I will try and speak to you, I will engage and talk but I will also tell you when I’m done and when I feel there is nothing more to be gained from our conversation.

 

 

tldr: Listen and RT.

 

 

P.S. If you are interested in following amazing Indigenous people on twitter you should definitely check out @YurokGuy @ZoeSTodd. Another worthy mention is @AdAstraComics who work with Indigenous writers and artists.

Posted by & filed under .

Hello Everyone, sorry for the late release of this episode, I want to justify it with complaining about my life but I digress here is an episode of me rambling for an age. I would be in error if I didn’t mention Tim Hunt and his recent comments (old news now) – relating to our own specific conversations in archaeology. Next up a story about a biblical vase and a name that appeared in the Bible. News about the Kennewick Man.  I finish the episode with a rant about the importance of Archaeology because it wouldn’t be me if I didn’t!

 

 

Links:

http://news.discovery.com/history/archaeology/rare-inscription-bearing-biblical-name-found-in-israel-150616.htm

Posted by & filed under .

Hello everyone, this is a quick update abotu what’s happening over the next number of months with the Anarchaeologist podcast. I am having to spread myself quite thin and I really don’t want to keep apologising for not releasing. I am thinking of changing to the format in the meantime to a “The Anarchaeologist Speaks” type in a bid to use what small time I have free to give you your well deserved episodes.

Thank you to everyone who has interacted and talked to me on Twitter and elsewhere – you are amazing and keep me going

 

Thanks

Tristan

Posted by & filed under .

 

gabeepisode copy

 

Hello and welcome back to a crowning example of what really happens when archaeologists talk at length. Gabe Moshenska makes a return to the show, bringing us up to date on his Oral Histories project but soon enough a wider conversation on the presentation of the Second World War and how history is used by various political factions to back up their own ideas. Furthermore we descend even deeper into the world of Political Correctness, the right wing and how archaeology can be part of rediscovering history.
WARNING: Contains Dirty Leftist Propaganda and possibly a profanity or two (I did try to edit them out)

Twitter:

@ArchPodNet

@GabeMoshenska

@Anarchaeologist

Posted by & filed under .

podcastlogoTodays episode transcends the atlantic ocean to bring the wonderful Zenobie Garrett, Archaeologist living in New York but originally from Illinoise. We talk Mediveal archaeology and how it isn’t what you normally expect and how public archaeology is the most important thing we can engage in. I comment on the culture of archaeologists and Zenobie drops a few puns. We talk about what archaeology is and why we were both drawn to it.
Find Zenobie on twitter @ZenobieWan